And the answer's yes. OBVIOUSLY. (Fun speculation. Get the idea?)
 |
| No. You Talk First. My Life Can Wait. Blonde, Interrupted: Silenced On Livestream |
TRIGGER WARNING: If you are a trigger, don't read. I'm going to have to irritate any antisemites by substantiating my opinions with Jewish heroes including a Jewish scientist and a part-Jewish journalist, and by pointing out that anyone with Protestant heritage is likely descended from anyone with Catholic heritage is largely descended from people with Jewish heritage is entirely descended from black ancestors who are descended from our common primate ancestors. Yes, +Cathy Young. I said Jew.
i.e. Evolution is racist and offensive.
 |
| You Wouldn't Want People To Know A Filthy, Butt-Licking Fascist Cat Is More Reasonable Than A Shiny Skeptic, Do You? |
Because science at its best is a process for generating knowledge about the world, whether or not nature conforms to our expectations.
Got that? It doesn't conform to our expectations. It doesn't care about your feels. It just is. That's why science doesn't have as many friends as... oh, I dunno. Hannah Ferguson:
THAT'S The reason Hannah's Popular, Right? Because She Cares About Your Feels?
If you're a guy, science makes your sex life better by telling you how to be fit, healthy, richer than you were, and attractive to women at LEAST as beautiful as Hannah Ferguson. (Until you fuck it up, anyway.)
If you're a non-guy (and therefore considered subhuman, according to feminists who de-humanize men), then science still makes your life better by helping you lovely ladies find great guys like me.
(Until YOU fuck it up by not having any interest in threesomes. What's up with that?)
To Understand Why A Well-Regarded Pro-Science Professional Intellectual Would Want A Smart, Pretty Blonde To Shut Up...
You'll need some background. All universally-useful stuff. And much more fun than your father's history class.
It helps us explain psychology of human emotions and behaviors. Such as why like +Armoured Skeptic or +Shoe0nHead (Who we'll be blaming for all our problems) or That Guy T or SugarTits might be frightened by or want to ridicule a pro-nationalist who publishes and promotes the hard work of some of the most capable and competent Jews you'd ever want to meet.
Sorry StormFrizzles. I said the Jews were competent. But #NotAllJews.
Okay, okay. I'm done with the jokes. But think about it. What's the big deal about talking about Jews? We talk about whites and blacks and even Asians who can't drive. The dirty Jews can always just take a shower, and then they're CLEAN Jews.
 |
| Types of cleansing: Anti-microbial AND Ethnic |
So obviously the social justice warriors hate the Jews. In their humorless society, the best comedy writing teams would be out of a job.
If You Hate Jokes, Then You Hate Jews, Feminists.
Fucking filthy feminism. The source of all our problems is we didn't burn their books when we had the chance. Now they're running around like cockroaches, inflitrating everything, living in the walls. Seems like there's only ONE WAY to get rid of feminism.
A final sol... oh, look. A distraction.
See how easy it is to hate and blame a group, rather than do your own thinking and research? REALLY fucking easy. It's why these hate cults like feminism spring up.
This is proof that the modern-day humorless radical feminazis hate the Jews.
 |
| Hey, Look! The Source of All Your Problems |
That's why I blame your tribalistic monkey wiring. I blame evolution.
I don't hate the player. I hate the game. (Plus Shoe & Skep, who are clearly behind it all!)
Bias Disclosure: If you're a weirdo like me who'd prefer a smaller government or an end to social justice, then I think you may prefer Trump to Hillary.
(Also if you hate genocide.)
You know who doesn't support Trump? That's right. People who hate your sex life and LOVE genocide. They are the bad evil monsters we must tribalist together to disagree with on the interwebs!
It's as if they don't even love America.
Please note that I didn't "check my privilege." Feel free to disregard people's conclusions, but beware their facts and arguments. They may have merit.
It's an odd thing for an anarcho/libertarian/athiest/Trump tolerator to say.
To the best of my knowledge, he doesn't even have the common courtesy to shit on other people's religions.
Given the rate of religiously-motivated violence, it would be nice to banish a religion like feminism (with it's belief in an unfalsifiable, supernatural patriarchy) banished from schools.
If Stalin can ban religion, so can we. And look how that turned out.
 |
| Or you might want to ban a little free speech instead, and stop them from being liars. |
And once again it's the sexy, anti-intellectual idea of Communism that threatens western civilization. So the German government banned certain forms of speech on a temporary basis, and hid behind ban to grow their power.
But if you make lying unlawful, only outlaws will have lies.
Nowadays, Germany only imprisons people for Holocaust denial. And that's MUCH better, right?
When the United States doesn't want to talk about how corrupt it's become, it hides behind "National Security."
i.e. We're not going to tell you because it's hugely embarrassing and makes us look like assholes.
That's self-censorship gone mad, And there's a pretty big difference.
Self-censorship (like National Security and privacy laws) allows people to claim or pretend they're wealthier than they are. Like your friends on dating sites or Facebook do.
Not me. I'm one of the poorest dudes you know. (But rich in influence.)
 |
| Even Fake Prisoners Turned To Communism In A Matter of Days |
The desire for equality and fairness seems to be rooted in biology.
When there's perceived or real inequality, the mad monkey part of your brain simply goes bananas. You act on instinct. Reason goes out the door.
"He worked hard for it" doesn't enter your mind anymore.
Tolerant societies turn to hatred. And free societies become unequal very rapidly.
Which, if you do the mental math, is the only justification for socialism you need, since people are happy to believe they're owed something, just for existing, and intellectuals rarely poke around beneath the Robin Hood idea of...
Take From The Rich And Give To The Poor
Breeding a stupid, do-nothing society in which ever more people can advocate for bigotry, intolerance, and guilt people into doing some profoundly anti-intellectual things.
And the maddening thing is that a moderate amount of socialism works to society's advantage, by giving the most talented (like Justin Bieber) an opportunity to survive his own parents' and country's incompetent views and policies long enough to sing "Baby baby."
Then Again, Socialist Redistribution Programs Also Produces Assholes Like Me
Assholes who tend to vote for bigger government, more welfare, and FFS can I at least get a decent dental plan?
 |
| I hope you're not skipping ahead, m8 |
From an evolutionary view, we could be a stronger society if we lined up poor people and the disabled and mass-executed them. Or that's what our intuitions about evolution might suggest. To cull the herd keeps the herd strong, right?
I predict we'll find the genetic basis of this culling instinct, and that it will be tightly associated with these genocides and politicides we keep seeing.
The epidemic of white male suicides isn't exactly a genocide. Nor is the epidemic of white male homelessness... killing them by famine, just like Stalin and Mao did with the politically inconvenient people of their times.
And oh, yeah. Hitler did that,too.
In a culture war, the powerful won't just interrupt a woman on a livestream. They'll send them to the gas chambers.
I mean, I'm all for TrigglyPuff sharing her opinion, but it wasn't her platform to do it.
I guess she was desperate for attention. And she got it.
In war, you can be mass-executed for wrongthink. And some white guys might dare to think they should get paid the same as a black man. Or get the same scholarship, job, and promotion opportunities a woman.
If they won't go along with the Marxist agenda, then they'll just have to starve.
Because how the hell can you get hired if you're a "racist" who "hates the Jews" when you point out the biological basis of communist impulses. Which is a bit of the pot calling the kettle black, if you ask me.
The reasons why men these days are terrified to talk to women, as Trump puts it, are too unpopular to point out here. See this instead:
If you didn't realize a communist politicide had already shown up on your doorstep, it's not your fault. It doesn't quite make the nightly news when people are actually...
Burning themselves to death in protest.
Which was my "red pill moment", to be honest. Combined with several jarring personal experiences, I knew something was wrong with the world.
Reality had been punching me in the face and I still wasn't awake. Kind of embarrassing, really.
If a tribalistic dominance instinct exists, there's no reason to think it hasn't existed since the dawn of tribes.
If you came from a ruthless family, and killed off disobedient children who dared to disregard the traditions which made your family successful, less calories were wasted on rebels. This gave obedient kids, tribes, cities, and countries ONE imprtant advantage.
If you built on that success by tolerating disagreement, you'd have the advantage of different, and eventually better tools, and weapons, ultimately allowing you to slaughter those with inferior weapons.
For the most part, tolerant tribes won out. But all this success would have created a fertile breeding ground for bad ideas about fairness and equality, victimization and entitlement.
In the old days, father would have slaughtered those pesky fuckers to protect his family. Or he might go really old-school, and toss away the crippled babies, to keep their nation strong. And capable of surviving attacks from other tribes.
And in World War II, Germany actually got rid of people who bucked against the new order. Freedom of speech was "temporarily" suspended, because some ideas were deemed to dangerous.
Meanwhile, in the United States, some Japanese who "could be spies" were rounded up into internment camps because they could be dangerous.
 |
| Constitution? What Constitution? |
And the smart, beautiful and productive class will happily get rid of you and enjoy a fucking renaissance of abundance build by dropping some of the dead weight.
Before, during or AFTER the revolution.
Or at least, that's what the Germans did. I'm going to need to consult my attorney on whether or not I can actually advocate for such a thing. No? Okay.
All I'm saying is that even the most extreme, brutal forms of fatherly masculinity appears to have a permanent place in the family, society, culture, and history.
These days, people are gravitating away from feminist rhetoric in droves.
What does this have to do with +Armoured Skeptic and +Blonde in the Belly of the Beast?
They're in a clash of the old politically correct bullshit and embracing a racist reality. The clash of denial versus acceptance.
The death throes of Communism in the West
And the clock is ticking. Because if we don't impose masculine discipline, the Marxist Muslims (ISIS, for example) will happily plunge the earth back into the dark ages, just like they've done everywhere else. (According to Maria Al-Masani, a political analyst.)
Or at least a messy economic collapse of those societies.
You're descended from people who were good at knowing which way the wind was blowing. It pays to be on the right side of history.
 |
| One gender gets boners. The other gets lady boners. |
Like the gorgeous, hard-working Daisy Ridley, in saying there are "two genders" while accepting an award in March, but in a way which allows for plausible deniability.
"It feels especially amazing to be part of a film that represents all genders – two genders – all races and all ages in a positive way," Ridley said as she accepted the award
Which could mean that there are only two genders, or that the movie only portrayed two genders. She's all set no matter which way history goes.
Or like Kaley Cocoa, who said she enjoys cooking for her husband.
 |
| "I was never that feminist girl demanding equality, but maybe that's because I've never really faced inequality." |
And Before We Get To Pointing Fingers, A Quick, Over-Simplified History Lesson You Never Signed Up For
We're living through history in the making.
 |
| And At Least Until The Robots Take Over, This Shit Matters |
But I Think We've Been Here Before
Yup. It was largely German communists who were executed, and for political reasons.
"But I'm not even a Jew" was certainly no defense, even in a country which had embraced full-on evil racism.
From the facts available to me by using a tool called Google, it appears to have been an equal opportunity politicide, but you can use Bing or whatever and come to your own conclusions there.
In China and Russia, many more people were deliberately or negligently killed by famine, disease, and fire. Not under Communist rule exactly, but under the Fascist governments installed by the useful idiots who thought communism was super sweet.
It's exactly what you'd expect from people with no fucking brains.
So the evil Nazis rose to power by learning from evil Communists how to win friends and influence people using evil propaganda. (More on that in a bit.)
They learned from the best...
How to play on their emotions. How to create effective propaganda to defeat communist bullshit.
You can learn how anti-intellectual propaganda works by watching +LeafyIsHere's stupid idiot lame-ass videos.
He never met a substantive argument he didn't fail to address.
Our culture believes the fatherly instinct to say things like "You're going out dressed like that?" is super toxic, right? Because dressing like you really want some sex might end up in you really getting some sex.
There's a tip, girls who are "in heat." If you want to get laid, dress like a whore.
Via a 2009 study, if you want a boyfriend who wants to get to know you first, you might want to dress the part.
Loving your daughters enough to advise them to be careful is so offensive.
I'm not judging people who want to dress promiscuously.
The instinct to put your foot down still exists. But culturally, it's been deemed by evil propagandists to be something disgusting and lame called "toxic masculinity." An idea for stupid, blue-haired land whales who can't get laid.
See? I'm using LeafyIsHere's level of bullshittery right now
You can pick it up that quickly.
What's really going on is an idea that's toxic to communism. Which may profit the rich, but it's also a natural result of.
And it explains why those pesky Germans were into ideas about breeding a master race, focusing on a better quality of people who wouldn't fall for this commie crap.
Equality is obviously wrong if you think about it for a few seconds. People are different, and good at different things, and you can't save all of them and wouldn't want to.
Father's ancient instinct to enforce obedience is the natural enemy of infantile commie rebels.
It's why some smart, sexy folks are getting sick and tired of being pushed by ugly, incompetent trolls. The solution is obvious, but it's distasteful.
Because we know the value of tolerance is rockets to fucking Mars.
Ideas like "We Ought to Just Nuke the Middle East" are clearly ignorant bigotry. Unless they're right.
Wimpy governments are insanely easy to corrupt. And we've seen it happen here. The end of World War I ended in the Treaty of Versailles. It was a raw deal that led to racism. An ethnic group got blamed and the History Channel won't let you forget it.
The masses are almost incapable of nuance.
Fire bad. Bill Cosby good. Wait... Bill Cosby bad. Fire good.
If they want to be thought of as anything other than useless simpletons, they'll have to do a much better job. They're irritating to intellectuals doing the real work in society while they slap together plastic parts and demand to be paid damn well for doing so.
I don't want to
Then again, the more tolerant you are of departing from tradition. you get more innovation
Are we talking over people who haven't been heard from? Or just saying the same things over and over again?
If we agree on the problems, but aren't willing to seriously discuss solutions, or allow others to discuss solutions, then we're working against our own interests.
We all hate feminists. Some of them want them sent to the ovens. Others merely want them roasted over a spit. But nobody likes them. The're not cool, smell bad, and have entirely too much blue hair under their fat arms.
The best thing you can ever do with trigglypuff is broadcast her to the world.
Unless you think she's right.
I believe ONE grain of truth exists in what she's stupidly flailing around about
Even though she's acting like a child, and being a huge hypocrite, she should have the right to speak and ridicule and criticize ideas she doesn't like.Even if you're a low down dirty sexist cis-hating heterophobe, if you don't let someone speak, you've robbed them of their voice: The source of their rights. The means to persuade others that action should be taken.
And in the past when people weren't allowed to speak,
They were compelled by lack of alternatives to resort to violent means.
And their families.
Because there was no system for them to work within. No hope. No opportunity. No freedom of thought.
Do you think that independent minded men can be stopped from following the dictates of their conscience when there's no other choice?
If they lose, they'll be dead. Freedom from fear. Freedom from pain.
If they win, they'll have power. Choice. A voice. They'll be useful fighters and soldiers when the old ways are washed away.
The simple mathematics of revolution are inevitable and immutable, and always have been, no matter what you choose to say about them.
As a man facing the inevitability of revolution, because people like you won't listen, you're facing men who choose to volunteer early, especially because they want to rape your wife, your girlfriend, and see the look on her face when they break down her door.
They're promised the greater share of the spoils of victory the sooner they start. Or freedom from fear and pain the moment they throw off their shackles.
It's why the idea to "live free or die" is such an appealing idea.
Once you choose the way of justifiable force, others will understand. Not everyone, but some. Like a dam which finally breaks.
Real men don't need those promises. They don't need your institutions and organizations. Don't need your courts or anyone's permission. The men you'd call criminals only need their conscience.
They'll be revered by some. Celebrated by many. Lusted after by women, even from behind bars. That's how it works.
Your ignorance of the way this works is simply an ignorance of history. If you're that oblivious, a man could be standing behind you right now with a noose.
Look around you. Rivers of blood and semen are already flowing in Europe.
People have worked hard to make us forget that the lowly peasants will get sick and tired of being held back. Pushed down. They'll get fed up.
They'll light the world on fire if it contains no freedom for them.
Fire's a cheap weapon to use. Look at Alberta. There hasn't been time to determine what started the blaze. But it was just waiting to happen.
The mathematics of revolution drives these people. It's no longer difficult or expensive.
When you give a Marxist President her power to pardon arsonists, rapists, murderers, burglars and thieves, you may as well have lit that match yourself.
By silencing the people sane enough to tell you the truth.
How will they feel about you then?
When men in the west are denied any reproductive rights, why on earth shouldn't they burn your world down with you in it?
 |
| Can You Kindly Explain The Part Where You Said You DON'T OWE ME Anything? |
All I'm doing is pointing out the gun in the room. Right there.
I'd rather let an angry man speak about his specific grievances and give him a platform and give him a process by which he could hope to recover those lost rights that are killing him than to invite open rebellion on a massive scale in country that's armed to the teeth and ready for a war at the drop of a hat.
25 million veterans in the States? Wow. That's a whole lot of people. I wonder what they'll do when they find out who's been fucking them.
I don't know who it is, but I know this much. Whoever has been continuously fucking them over for their entire lives...
Wants Them to Shut The Fuck Up.
Do you really want to be known as the person who sparked a violent rebellion by deliberately silencing people without rights... without anything left to lose?
And what about their daughters? Their girlfriends? Their wives? Their fiances won't can't find any guy who'll marry them, who's boyfriends won't get them pregnant for fear of what YOUR system will do to them, voter?
Voting Is An Act Of Organized Violence
The Immigrant's Weapon Of Choice Is The State
People Who Cross The Border Illegally Are Criminals
If those things are true, then we seem to be inviting into our country a violent, invading army led across the border by traitors. Bring in enough of them, and they'll vote anyone into power that feeds them money they took from people like you and me.
Do you most fear that it's an unreasonable idea, or that it's a reasonable one?
 |
| It Was The Only Logical Choice At The Time |
And as a bonus, she stated an tiny area of agreement.
Politeness also runs rampant. Politeness silences those who disagree. And too much silence and politeness leads to ruinous feminist policies, protects bad ideas and bad haircuts.
But it also creates temporary harmony. There's a time and a place for a respectful, thoughtful, polite debate.
And if you have to get rid of being respectful and polite, you should still allow for debate unless you still think you look damn good with that hair:
 |
| He Totally Looks Like Brad Pitt With That Hair. All The Western Progressives Are Doing It Now |
You barge in unannounced. You start talking sfhit. You don't know or care what's going on. You interrupt the people who are talking. Who's letting that happen? How many people does it take to waste one woman's time?
Maybe She Sounds Too Reasonable. Does That Scare You?
With Big Red, (Chanty Binx) she wanted to show what men's issues feminists wanted to co-opt and hypocritically appear to address, but the kernel of truth is that even Big Red admits:
Men Do Have Real Issues Right Now. They Need To Be Addressed.
 |
| "If You Do Not Return My Swingline Stapler, I Shall Burn This Hut Down" |
It seems you don't win any popularity contests by saying it.
With Kate Brooks, she thought that ridicule could have a chilling effect on those who feel hurt by those words.
A lot of people have felt that pain. Nobody wants to be banished. I don't agree these people have the solutions any serious person would want to entertain, but they should be allowed to say it.
The reason she was shouting? Because she was being talked over. Not allowed to read from her list. This isn't no-platforming. It's not shadow-banning. But it's fuckeroundery.
When Black Lives Matter activists grabbed the microphone from Bernie Sanders in Seattle, they weren't letting him finish, even after he offered to let them speak when he was finished.
 |
| "Imma Let You Finish" |
But it's also true that they also had something to say. A voice and complaints that hadn't been heard or accessible by the general public.
Thank goodness they were so rude, aggressive, and abusive so we don't need to listen to what their opinions.
And in the same way, I don't need to take Armoured Skeptic as seriously if he feels so desperate for attention he has to steal the spotlight away from a blonde white girl in a Trump hat.
Is he afraid of what she might say? Or just desperate for attention?
 |
| How Does That Backrub Feel? You Want A Happy Ending? What Do You Mean Now's Not The Time? |
I Know. It's Not Easy Letting Go
I know what desperation feels like. When I sat with my grandmother in that doctor's office as she was receiving a diagnosis for inoperable form of cancer, I felt helpless. Alone. Like I was losing the only thing I had left to lose.
And when the doctors wouldn't return our calls, I felt desperate, fearful, and angry.
Like my voice wasn't being heard.
When an advocate for a possible, practical solution showed up, I'd hoped she'd get to tell her story about how hard it is for guys to want to settle down.
If I were dating a girl who's biological clock was ticking, and she was at the point of maybe looking for a serious commitment, I might not want the subject of marriage brought up at all in the presence of my girlfriend.
I might feel the need to supervise or derail that conversation, if at all possible. To buy myself some goddamned time.
And buying time is what small-government libertarian Lauren Southern wants to do in this election.
Recent immigrants vote for big governement because it's in their financial interest to do so.
If you want to call established second and third generation immigrants "the establishment", then you can understand why established business interests consistently push for policies that keep most of the young generations at the bottom of the heap for as long as possible.
You'll get your break-outs like Mark Zukerberg, but they're the exception to the rule. What usually happens is...
"Would you like fries with that?"
Trigglypuff is a virtually a gift from heaven. Evidence for the existence of God if I've ever seen it. She's a miracle to our cause. Or as the Donald would put it "I love protesters."
It was worth far more to shutting down social justice than anything Christina Hoff Sommers could say for the tenth time. Worth more than any petition we've managed to circulate.
Milo didn't even bother making a speech. What's the point? The crowd is saying everything you'd want to say. Just look at them.
And the backlash against feminism might get these irritating people to WANT to shut up and finally let us speak. But I doubt it. And I wouldn't want to have to go to all the trouble of making a case when a single photo says it all.
It appears they used physical assault and intimidation to get what they wanted, instead of waiting their turn.
But even if you have to make someone wait until the end, let them talk until the janitor comes to turn the lights off. Let them shout in the parking lot as everyone drives away home.
But for heaven's sake, let them speak. Let them say what they want, as long as it's not silencing or intimidating other people.
I feel like I witnessed a bit of a passive aggressive dogpile going on.
When the pro-Trump white girl gets about as much time to talk as you'd expect from her position on the progressive stack and says about as much as she'd get to say at a
When quiet little +Shoe0nHead, who's admitted she's usually the quiet one on streams takes this occasion to chatter virtaully nonstop, thus proving she has nothing to say,
When Bearing might have been the most charitable one in letting all these women have their day in the sun.
Hell, I'm glad Shoe finally opened up. Why hasn't that happened before. Get the woman some caffeine, please. Finally, her voice is being heard.
But only when a nationalist might say something in the presence of other influencers?
Is +Shoe0nHead afraid +Blonde in the Belly of the Beast has something substantial to offer on the subject of marriage? Something pro-lolcow? Pro-Trump? Pro-marriage? Pro-family?
When I have to come down on Shoe0nHead for going after the reasonable complaints made by MGTOW, and then turn around and aggressively defend someone who's pro-marriage, then...
It's more than possible some sillyfuckery is going on.
If I were anti-MGTOW, anti-feminist, and was a girl with a guy I was truly committed to, then I think I'd want to hear what a pro-marriage person had to say about the problems even +Chanty Binx (Big Red) admits to the exist of.
In fact, there's only one group of people I know of who use no-platforming, shadow-banning, and shenanigans to silence people who might dare talk about the problems men have with marriage.
And that group of people is the radical Marxist man-hating feminists.
But you can't be a feminist AND an anti-feminist can you? Can Skeptic? Can anyone? The quick answer to that is: Islam is the religion of peace. I've just said it, so it must be true, right? Don't answer unless you're a feminist or Marxist or a globalist who's triggered by someone who dares to talk out of turn.
If I'm right about the religion of peace, and I somehow have a better argument, then I wouldn't want to resort to no-platforming, shadow-banning, shenanigans, or general fuckeroundery that's running rampant among social justice circles.
I'd LOVE to expose their obvious bigotry and hypocrisy by giving them my loudest megaphone possible, like with TrigglyPuff, and then letting their critics tear it to shreds while I sit back and laugh at the memes.
The down-side is we've tried all that, and Marxist views continue to make strides and make converts at a rate of millions of students per year in the Universities who go on to teach pseudo scientific nonsense to millions of children in public schools.
In part, because they can always enlist yet another generation of young women who love the idea of silencing their critics by:
- deleting their comments
- closing off comment sections
- disabling ratings
- not permitting them a panel
- having them sign selectively-enforced agreements that impose penalties for criticizing other SXSW panelists
- using egg accounts that look like they come from neckbearded basement-dwellers instead of blue-haired interns
- manipulating the national press with sensational stories that aren't remotely true
- getting people arrested, prosecuted, and removed from the internet
I'm not generally a fan of those kinds of tactics. What they have in common? They prevent people from speaking.
Specifically, the prevent people from criticizing someone in power.
We have a large, agreed-upon problem that deserves an voice. It deserves an audience. Even if someone turns out to be...
A Racism Apologist Jewish Scientist Backed Up By Nothing But Hard Evidence.
Especially in that case.
When I see a hint of anti-speech in this election season, I do start to get a little suspicious of the people involved.
My suspicion of some turns into suspicion of others who may be perfectly innocent.
I start to get a little worried. I start wondering how many more centuries of this Cultural Marxist progressive bullshit we actually want to sign up for and support.
I'll show a connection between Hillary Clinton and Marsist/Maoist views held by the deadliest tyrants in history that you're free to ignore or correct me on.
As I say, I'm not a pro-nationalist myself. It's only reluctantly and pragmatically that I'm persuaded that a vote for Trump in this election may be the last time a vote counts for anything. Or maybe the last time an election meant something was back before electronic boxes did our tallying for us.
Although in a fair election, a tamper-evident re-count would be preserved as an option, and happened when Al Gore was elected. The Supreme Court seems to disagree with Mr. Gore.
So the United States ended up embroiled in foreign wars, a de-stabilized Middle East that's led to immigration problems. All this might have happened anyway, but the point is it's best to make sure the elections are as fair as possible, or else you'll end up with the least fair person running things, all other things being equal.
And to me, that means keeping the discussions as fair and open as possible. It's a waste of precious time to do otherwise.
Again, it's not a debate. Not an interview. It's billed as a chat. So I must not be a fan of chats. Small talk is not the thing that's in short supply, in my opinion.
Nevertheless, some valuable things were eventually said about how you can develop social skills by getting a job that exposes you to chatterboxes who complain a lot.
Social skills are incredibly valuable, very impressive, and can even allow you to silence and ridicule people who aren't cool enough without even discussing the issue. Social skills teach you:
It's Stopped Being Cool To Care
Who cares about the fate of millions of people displaced from their homes, and the chats they'll have, the borders they'll cross, the innocent women they'll rape, torture, and murder under a Marxist regime they vote into office? Like Britain's first Muslim Mayor.
I'm just guessing he's been elected primarily because you're a racist if you didn't vote for him. We went through that with Obama.
And of cousre you're a sexist if you don't vote for Hillary.
Meaning you're a sexist if you don't advocate for Hillary. Or a sexist if you wear a Trump hat. Or a sexist if you agree with Chanty Binx about men having issues feminists would like to appear to address.
Just like they appear to address women's issues by pushing for policies that make women miserable.
I'd rather be called a sexist racist than vote for a Muslim Woman if she's writing poetry to Marx and celebrating the #KillAllMen crowd. Because letting the feminists elect their Mao hands them the keys to the nuclear arsenal.
Would you hand Mao a nuclear arsenal? I would NOT.
It lets them use the power of the presidency to drum up blowback and false flag attacks, which have preceded almost every major war of the 20th century.
It gives them the a nationwide network of FEMA camps that would accommodate the largest genocide the world's ever seen.
Personally, I don't want to see That Guy T, and Armoured Skeptic working in those "labor camps" just because Hillary's MORE SERIOUS than Trump.
And I definitely wouldn't want him elected because someone felt like someone might associate them with racism if they let a white woman say something that might actually offend someone.
We get to hear about "muh roads" for the libertarian.
People bashed on MGTOW for a few minutes.
Calling her a Nazi fascist would actually be an improvement.
It would be polite by comparison to what I saw.
I still don't know why anyone considers nationalism a solution to the feminist policies that make men afraid to settle down, but I'd like to hear about it. I don't mind other people hearing about it.
I'm not afraid people will suddenly turn into racists because they hear an extremist blame "The Jews" for how fat they are, how bad their sex life is, or because their car won't start.
Open conversations that included stupid, shouting violent bigots gave people freedom and rights they never had before. Is that a problem for you?
 |
| It's Time To Discuss Doing The OPPOSITE Of What This Nitwit Likes |
LET THAT WOMAN SPEAK
Even if you're afraid she'll make you look ridiculous by sounding sane. I'll make sure you look even more ridiculous by refusing to listen, just as other people listen to you.Maybe I should have said it months ago, but sometimes it's okay to talk to daddy. What's your complaint, little darlin'? What can daddy do to fix it?
As much as those who propose nationalism as a solution to the (IMHO) over-regulated institution of marriage.
And why it has anything to do with the gender differences that got us into this mess. I'm ignorant.
So besides
I'm simply persuaded that electing a Maoist is a bad idea, and that electing someone who favors illegal immigration of big-government voters is contrary to the libertarian interest in small-government.
So draw your on conclusions or make excuses for, or even dispute these sticky facts I'll present, but I'm not blaming any individuals for their fear of properly conducted, properly reviewed, well-established scientific findings which predict
Not all science fits that description, and I'm just some guy with a free blog.
If there's one thing science demonstrates, it's that people in positions of power are afraid of any science that disagrees with them.
In the past month or so, Blonde In The Belly Of The Beast has done several interviews in which she seems unaware of the pro-establishment elements
In a recent chat, she hardly spoke at all. What was billed as a 5-person stream took on two more surprise guests
I would characterize it as being dominated by Shoe0nHead and Blaire, with Blonde getting or taking very few opportunities to chime in. And it's not that sort of format. It's not an interview. But as a recent fan of the blonde girl in the Trump hat who isn't happy with the establishment,
I'm not surprised or disappointed Blaire did so much talking. But didn't really bring up any of the serious issues that are apparently a really big deal, such as President Obama's
I explain the Orwellian downside to this in the no-platforming era where free speech is routinely silenced in all sorts of blatant ways, both online and off. It's not even controversial to say. Everybody nationalist, MRA, MGTOW, Gamergater knows first or second hand about about the corruption of the press, the shadowbanning of public figures on social media.
It's the censorship Milo Yiannopoulos brought up in his questions at the White House and the censorship he's addressing in his request to interview Mark Zuckerberg.
I was not just "Sad Panda" disappointed Blonde didn't get to say much. I felt
I'm not surprised or disappointed Blaire did so much talking. But didn't really bring up any of the serious issues that are apparently a really big deal, such as President Obama's
White House directing public schools to open up bathrooms to students based on gender identity.
I explain the Orwellian downside to this in the no-platforming era where free speech is routinely silenced in all sorts of blatant ways, both online and off. It's not even controversial to say. Everybody nationalist, MRA, MGTOW, Gamergater knows first or second hand about about the corruption of the press, the shadowbanning of public figures on social media.
It's the censorship Milo Yiannopoulos brought up in his questions at the White House and the censorship he's addressing in his request to interview Mark Zuckerberg.
I was not just "Sad Panda" disappointed Blonde didn't get to say much. I felt
It bordered on the no-platforming censorship, or at least the shadowbanning fuckeroundery we're all getting used to and not talking nearly enough about.
 |
| Milo Yiannopoulos at the White House asks press secretary for answers about online censorship. March 4, 2016 |
If you were the staunchest racist and or anti-semite, you'd be doing a bad job of blaming the Jews for your troubles if you showed a partly-Jewish man championing free speech online. It's about the most anti-establishement activity you could do.
Pro-establishment people include social justice fans like +Uptomyknees, who's said he's the son of Hollywood director Jon Landis, and that people make a lot of assumptions about their relationship. Just because Max Landis has rainbow-colored hair and
In fact, my judgment based on observations is he plays both sides to his own advantage. And does it extremely well. There are several things to like about him and disagree about, but the upcoming election is what +Armoured Skeptic tweeted to him about here.
Pro-establishment people include social justice fans like +Uptomyknees, who's said he's the son of Hollywood director Jon Landis, and that people make a lot of assumptions about their relationship. Just because Max Landis has rainbow-colored hair and
In fact, my judgment based on observations is he plays both sides to his own advantage. And does it extremely well. There are several things to like about him and disagree about, but the upcoming election is what +Armoured Skeptic tweeted to him about here.
 |
| Harry Ostrer |
But in a world full of such extraordinary achievements and innovations by unbelievably talented people, to leave any important races or religions out of your discussions or understanding of history would strike me as foolish.
And I think we're seeing history in the making today. Its a kind of history in which the importance of Asian people and Jewsish heritage is rather seriously downplayed by the regressive left.
The science of biology is not always politically correct or pro-establishement. Ideas like instinct, as pointed out by Harvard Professor and author Stephen Pinker.
He remarked that those who've had a pet dog and a baby growing up in the same environment will have noticed only one achieves the powers of speech.
Inborn traits play some role.
Reasons for the pushback. I'd find it insulting to
http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/dna-links-prove-jews-are-a-race-says-genetics-expert-1.428664
In his book, Legacy, A Genetic History of the Jewish People, Ostrer says he's Jewish himself. It's natural to wonder about your own heritage and family tree.
It's hard to call Harry Osterer an anti-semite. He's Jewish himself.
Geneticists and biologists sometimes say bold and unsettling things, such as when Richard Dawkins wrote the controversial The Selfish Gene.
And I think we're seeing history in the making today. Its a kind of history in which the importance of Asian people and Jewsish heritage is rather seriously downplayed by the regressive left.
The science of biology is not always politically correct or pro-establishement. Ideas like instinct, as pointed out by Harvard Professor and author Stephen Pinker.
He remarked that those who've had a pet dog and a baby growing up in the same environment will have noticed only one achieves the powers of speech.
Inborn traits play some role.
Reasons for the pushback. I'd find it insulting to
http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/dna-links-prove-jews-are-a-race-says-genetics-expert-1.428664In his book, Legacy, A Genetic History of the Jewish People, Ostrer says he's Jewish himself. It's natural to wonder about your own heritage and family tree.
It's hard to call Harry Osterer an anti-semite. He's Jewish himself.
Geneticists and biologists sometimes say bold and unsettling things, such as when Richard Dawkins wrote the controversial The Selfish Gene.
Some deny the existence of race entirely. A view not in keeping with Harry Osterer's controversial finding that Jews are a race. How can they be a race if races don't exist?
It's as if pulled you pulled the statement from a social justice course:
It's as if pulled you pulled the statement from a social justice course:
Race is a social construct.
I'd find it insulting
But science continues to be the enemy of lies and liars. It shakes the foundations of powerful empires built on deception. It's a powerful tool, and its facts, once properly established, can't be ignored by any serious person.
I think that's why we've seen ideologists pushing back hard against science, calling it a social construct, developed through colonization. A claim I haven't seen supported by facts.
+Armoured Skeptic should remember how disgusted he was on seeing this photograph, showing what outrageous things students are being taught in colleges and universities today, behind closed doors, in secret, after signing an nda.
So it's not as simple as saying some people are pro-science and others are anti-science. Richard Dawkins has considered himself a feminist. But he's careful in how he uses the term.
The Blank Slate view holds that we're shaped primarily or entirely by culture, and that biology plays little to no role.
If there were no truth to this, I wouldn't bother writing this article. But it's not the whole story.
Proponents of the Blank Slate would find a cultural explanation for everything. Saying things like this is a social construct. That is a social construct.
Ultimately, it's convenient to rich public companies to push this agenda, and illegal not serve the interests of their shareholders. It's the much-touted fiduciary responsibility.
Munger also pointed out to Harvard students that to a man with a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail. Almost directly quoting the Bernard Baruch in the process. The full transcript is here, including a description of the way B.F. Skinner lost credibility by applying his operant conditioning as a cure-all.
You can't cure everything with social constructs. Because all of our behavior is informed by culture, circumstances, biology, and even the weather.
In a couple of studies, rates of violence appear to respond to temperature more than anything else. Which was a huge disappointment to me. Personally, I really wanted religion to be the best predictor of gun violence. But it's weather.
I ranked religion as the second best predictor of homicides. Over and above the predictors others were willing to study in determining whether access to a gun is more likely to lead to homicide. The results aren't obvious, therefore controversial, and something people prefer to ignore in politics, so I'll let you investigate it on your own.
But this body of biological and genetic research starts to create a picture of our behavior as pre-programmed, habit-driven biological machines, more than anything else. Or moist robots" as Scott Adams puts it.
Marxist experiments keep failing, often disastrously, leading to the largest scale of systematic cruelty in the 20th century.
If there were no truth to this, I wouldn't bother writing this article. But it's not the whole story.
Proponents of the Blank Slate would find a cultural explanation for everything. Saying things like this is a social construct. That is a social construct.
Ultimately, it's convenient to rich public companies to push this agenda, and illegal not serve the interests of their shareholders. It's the much-touted fiduciary responsibility.
Munger also pointed out to Harvard students that to a man with a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail. Almost directly quoting the Bernard Baruch in the process. The full transcript is here, including a description of the way B.F. Skinner lost credibility by applying his operant conditioning as a cure-all.
You can't cure everything with social constructs. Because all of our behavior is informed by culture, circumstances, biology, and even the weather.
In a couple of studies, rates of violence appear to respond to temperature more than anything else. Which was a huge disappointment to me. Personally, I really wanted religion to be the best predictor of gun violence. But it's weather.
I ranked religion as the second best predictor of homicides. Over and above the predictors others were willing to study in determining whether access to a gun is more likely to lead to homicide. The results aren't obvious, therefore controversial, and something people prefer to ignore in politics, so I'll let you investigate it on your own.
But this body of biological and genetic research starts to create a picture of our behavior as pre-programmed, habit-driven biological machines, more than anything else. Or moist robots" as Scott Adams puts it.
Marxist experiments keep failing, often disastrously, leading to the largest scale of systematic cruelty in the 20th century.
It's not culture friends. Its culture war.
If someone were to tell you that serious scientists believed in race, but religious people feared the implications.
If someone were to tell you that serious scientists believed in biological drivers, but the universities preferred you didn't learn it.
If someone were to tell you that serious scientists believed behavior could all neatly explain the our drives with a theory of biology-driven behavior, and it explained why people
They'd be left at calling you a racist, an anti-semite.
You can't call
You can't call
Currently pushing Maoist/Stalinist views by the sort of people who push globalism, social justice, feminism, organize Black Lives Matter protests in which former Professor Melissa Click has been charged with inciting violence.
It easy to piece these things together the wrong way, but the pattern of facts begin to fit only one model: People doing what's in their best perceived financial interests.
Which is the fancy way of saying "follow the money." But Warren Buffett's billionaire partner Charlie Munger was kind enough in his Psychology of Human Misjudgment, a set of remarks delivered in 1995 at Harvard University, to point out the surprising power of incentives, among other things.
But not the kind your'e likely to find in your public school textbooks or university course materials.
As soon as Skeptic jumped in, there were the standard set of gay jokes between himself and Bearing.
Is this a hint of the clash between pro-men's rights and anti men's rights?
My Specific Observations:
Blonde didn't get much of an introduction.
Maybe she's not trans enough to have an opinion, you heterophobic shitlord! Is that the only kind of social pressure you'll respond to?
She barely spoke in the first 15 minutes.
After that, Armoured Skeptic jumped in. Then That Guy T.
Maybe she's not trans enough to have an opinion, you heterophobic shitlord! Is that the only kind of social pressure you'll respond to?
She barely spoke in the first 15 minutes.
After that, Armoured Skeptic jumped in. Then That Guy T.
And toward the end, almost without warning, SugarTits ended the stream before Blonde had said much of anything in the 2 hours and 6 minutes.
And as a narcissist-leaning male, I want to believe it's because SugarTits wants me all to herself, and she's kicking herself for giving a stage to a right-leaning activist. But that can't be true.
Nobody as sexy as SugarTits would find my disembodied voice attractive.
I'm aware some of the things I've said COULD promote some needless in-fighting amongst people who largely agree that
FEMINISM MUST DIE
Or something like that. And MGTOW is a different situation. It's not rich and politically powerful.
Yes, it could go and die, and +Blaire White wouldn't miss them, but MGTOW isn't, to my knowledge, actively campaigning for genocide for the last 40 years, pulling strings in politics, forcing its ideology into classrooms.
It's pretty much just hurting people's feelings in YouTube comments and telling them to get woke.
Sargon can let a MGTOW like @Star StarDusk on his livestream to kick shit at Sandman
Which does hurt peoples' feelings enough to get them to delete their YouTube account twice. Which is a pretty significant amount of hurt feelings, I'd say.
If facts and science hurt your feelings when you've got a billion dollar company that's profiting by hurting people, then I don't mind hurting your feelings.
As Armoured Skeptic said in the stream, it's not that you deserve it, but that you brought it on yourself.
If facts and science hurt your feelings when you've got a billion dollar company that's profiting by hurting people, then I don't mind hurting your feelings.
As Armoured Skeptic said in the stream, it's not that you deserve it, but that you brought it on yourself.
You'll remember That Guy T from the in-fighting moment regarding the anti-social justice petition Sargon of Akkad was promoting just last week or so.
That Guy T made a video which was a debating about whether it's applied to public or private schools. And after taking up loads of time on a stream discussing his objections with Sargon, not much else got accomplished.
So it seems something that could be described as in-fighting or disagreement over a fine point blew up into not much more than a waste of everyone's valuable time.
I disagree with you.
Hours later
Okay I agree with you.
That's the sign of someone genuinely intending to discuss something, or it's stalling. Which the establishment would rather you do.
Now it's fair to play devil's advocate, and there's always a role for it when your opponents won't show up. This has sometime been done in marketing circles over the past several years, where a person faces a "tough" interview and has to answer hard questions.
Heck, I brought up some very tough questions in my last article about Blonde tipping the election to Trump.
So it seems something that could be described as in-fighting or disagreement over a fine point blew up into not much more than a waste of everyone's valuable time.
I disagree with you.
Hours later
Okay I agree with you.
That's the sign of someone genuinely intending to discuss something, or it's stalling. Which the establishment would rather you do.
Now it's fair to play devil's advocate, and there's always a role for it when your opponents won't show up. This has sometime been done in marketing circles over the past several years, where a person faces a "tough" interview and has to answer hard questions.
Heck, I brought up some very tough questions in my last article about Blonde tipping the election to Trump.
And people are frequently divided over methods, even when they agree on the outcomes they want.
But I don't think that's what's happening here. I think some people would really rather that Trump didn't win. It's not always the same people who call people "Nazis" and make fun of "Stormfags",
My only problem with this is I wouldn't want Hillary to win. And this is the reason:
For those who understand the Marxist roots of the feminism movement, something Erin Pizzey talks about from her firsthand experience 40 years ago and her research.
 |
| Add caption |
Marxism is one of those bad ideas that only benefits a tyrant.
It provides a path to power do do things we'd all agree are as evil as humanity can get.
It's a bad idea that can't tolerate the light of reason. It never has.
Trouble is, the rich seem to be able to get their way an awful lot. I hear the rich man's laws pass about 60% to 80% in the U.S., if memory serves.
Disregard it if you doubt it.
Do I need to prove it when everybody knows Congress is for sale? Corruption has led to disaster.
It's called Plutocracy. A form of oligarchy where society is ruled OR controlled by a small minority of the wealthiest.
In recent years, mostly women voters have been turning out to vote for bigger, stronger governments to protect them.
In recent years, mostly women voters have been turning out to vote for bigger, stronger governments to protect them.
In comes Sugar Tits, inviting. Now I know you're the weirdo tin foil hat conspiracy nut if you make assumptions, but I'm not going to assume a husband and a wife's politics are the same. You can if you like. But I'm not sure who's then "conspired" to hold a nice chat.
If you want to hear Blonde's thoughts, 600dfella's stream was most enlightening to me. The most candid. Enjoy.
UPDATE:
I don't really believe whole-heartedly that Skeptic or Shoe or anyone else is really to blame. The thing is, women are easily silenced by liberal zealots who have them convinced they can't be bossy, butt in, interrupt, but that's what you have to do in the war of ideas.
So I might have been wrong in this post about one pretty important thing.
And this is considered sexist when you say it the right way around, but almost universally tolerated when you state it this way:
Never send a man in to do a woman's job and...
(The only alarmingly sexist and offensive thing I'll bother to say here today.)
Vice versa.
No comments:
Post a Comment