Swing-Voting, particularly attractive, smart millennial women are starting to complain very seriously and persistently that it's much harder to get a guy to want to settle down. True enough, but now a growing number of women blame the corrupt and lopsided divorce industry, family courts, and unfair rights that put THE FEAR OF DIVORCE into potential husbands. And these wannabe wives are starting to agree with them.
Intelligent, attractive women are looking for any solution, including national independence and even nationalism for an equality-based solution to safely start a family in America.
 | |
|
I only just found Blonde In The Belly Of The Beast (her channel name) online today, thanks to Australian antifeminist comedians Bearing and gal Sugartits. (They publicly ridicule the worst of the vocal feminists online, but their concerns about legal rights for married couples and their kids across the Western world are no laughing matter.)
[Personal bias disclosure: I've been waiting for almost a year to find someone as motivated and outspoken and persuasive as Blonde, looking for saner, more rational policies for marriage.]
 |
| Some Men Have Stopped Trusting Women To Have Their Best Interests At Heart |
In this election year, it seems there are more women than ever going against the grain. And Blonde's been searching her whole life for a perfect guy to settle down with. And whoever didn't tell me is fired.*
In case you gentlemen hadn't noticed by now... when women start to stand up for what they want, they very often get it in the end.
But Blonde's advocacy isn't for more women's rights at all. This is a new twist on an old idea:
Now women are actually advocating AGAINST WOMEN'S RIGHTS... to take the fear out of marriage so it's easier to land a great guy for keeps.
 |
| Smart, Beautiful Right-Wing Millenial Women Are Looking For Changes To Make It Easier To Start Families |
- First, you'd have to have a close race.
- And a groundswell of support in time to change the outcome.
- And a big pool of undecided voters.
- Since 70% of voters are women, it matters how they vote.
- The vast majority of eligible voters don't vote, so it the size of voter participation matters a lot.
- And about 18% of women in the country identify as feminists. Although this number's been falling since the 1990s.
- And the killer advantage:
- Married couples have sex about twice as often sex as single people.
Even some of the most beautiful intelligent women...
Even Those who can easily find a boyfriend...
Even Those who can easily find a boyfriend...
Won't be able to find men willing to marry them.
So what message and messenger could take a huge non-voting block of undecided young women voters to swamp the polls and vote for A MAN?
Swing votes or not, some people say Trump's got it in the bag by a landslide, and others aren't so sure. Some do see how non-racist nationalism has solved in prosperous places like Switzerland.
Blacks and latinos are largely considered the groups that can decide the election. But women have never been more unhappy, despite objectively holding more legal rights designed to protect them from discrimination.
"Blonde", as I'll call her, or @LibtardAmerica may be...
The Best Thing to Happen to Your Sex Life Since Sliced Wonder-Bread
Yes, really.
But if you want to get things done...
Fame is Just the Price You Have to Pay Sometimes
In a way that "clones herself" by drawing more women like her out of the woodwork. So that feminism dies a more rapid death by multiplying the pool of tuned in, turned on, and dropped out women looking for that one incredible guy who was practically born to make them happy.
And women tend to draw an audience, and then the men follow, politician say.
And women tend to draw an audience, and then the men follow, politician say.
 |
| Thousands of Men Found Trump-Supporting Women More Attractive |
It seems feminists made a tactical blunder by enlisting "the idiots and ugly ones", as Blonde puts it.
Actually, the desire to "clone her" is one of the top request I've seen in the comments of her YouTube videos.
She's perfect. She's great. Too good to be true.
As at least one of her fans noted. What
All signs which point to psychopathy, right? NOPE. Sorry. You forgot that psychopathy typically comes with an abundant supply of charm. Such women have no need for charm. Fatal attraction is off the table. She's plain spoken and persuasive, but not
 |
| First Video: Calling Out Wimpy Men Who Hate Capitalism And Free Speech In The Land of Libtards And Rude Immigrants |
For the past decade, my balls have not yet been so blue that I'd bend a knee to someone who's merely pretty. Besides, I'm sure she rolls out of bed without makeup and a rat's nest in her hair just like anyone else.
To some extent, looking good the product of the choices you make. I thought I'd address this and get it out of the way before bringing it up a dozen more times.
But one way in which the feminists aren't 100% wrong (and that's the devil of it), youth and beauty really do seem to come with a social power no less real than intelligence or strength or killer nunchuck skills.
I mean sense of humor.
The automatic social value of those markers of vitality comes with a kind of social privilege identified by both science and fake liberal pseudo science.
And those who know about this "Halo Effect" that makes us trust good-looking people, the better educated develop a defensive, knee-jerk tendency to dismiss what pretty girls are actually saying. Even when they know better.
Why? Prejudice. Because their own life experience has taught them this:
Miss, You Seem To Have Lost The Bag Of Rocks You're Dumber Than
Or maybe fumes from the petroleum jelly on her teeth was killing her brain cells for a minute.
Don't call me an SJW for saying the ditzy blonde is a stereotype. Because that would be stereotyping people who use the word stereotype.
Because campus feminist fascists are definitely wrong.
They're just not completely wrong about every single thing all the time.
Not every blonde is ditzy. There's a spectrum.
Not every blonde is ditzy. There's a spectrum.
 |
| The Ditzy Dumb Blonde Spectrum Ranges From Miss Carolina To Milo Yiannopoulos |
Some girls do manage burn their hair off trying to go blonde. If men can be that dumb, women can be that dumb.
 |
| Not All Girls Are Created Equal. Pictured: Lauren Southern |
The teeming masses of thousands of people who find or follow me will recognize the merits of my argument here.
Like you, they'll see for themselves whether @LibtardAmerica is adding to the conversation or not.
"What Did HE Do? Steve Jobs Added Nothing To The Conversation"
Overrated. This requirement is a bit like asking Steve Jobs to personally program your iPhone in order to justify his existence. Hasn't he done enough for you?
Some bands don't see the need to have a front man. Someone who may have no other competence than their various charms. But I like a good front man. Serves my purposes.
Even when the best man for the job is a woman. As in the case with Karen Straughan.
I certainly don't care whether or not Milo Yiannopoulis can lace his own shoes. And sometimes I actually wonder if he can. Like when he explains his prejudice against uncut cocks in his mouth on The Joe Rogan show.
(After which, Milo apparently decided to get swole.)
Even when the best man for the job is a woman. As in the case with Karen Straughan.
I certainly don't care whether or not Milo Yiannopoulis can lace his own shoes. And sometimes I actually wonder if he can. Like when he explains his prejudice against uncut cocks in his mouth on The Joe Rogan show.
(After which, Milo apparently decided to get swole.)
 |
| Milo Yiannopoulos, But Even More Fantastic |
Manufacturing ideas isn't nearly as lucrative as publicizing them.
Now I have to be careful not to subject @LibtardAmerica to the culture shock
I may not shower her with all the attendant and perfunctory compliments "owed" to the all women.
Even the most hateful, cruel ugly idiot bigots have come to expect compliments because of the reproductive equipment they were born with.
"Maybe Star Wars Just Doesn't Care About Men!" - Whil Wheaton
Most people can't even bring themselves to plaster on the kind of phony courtesy expected from someone opening an unwanted birthday present when it comes to acknowledging the difficulties of the underclass.
But let's don't count out the Halo Effect yet.When someone has the dreamy eyes of Sargon of Akkad, the buttery-smooth voice of Harmful Opinions, the brains of Karen Straughan, the passion of Doctor Mike Randomercam, and even a bit of the humor of Bearing, you tend to make the odd assumption that they aren't one of the "kinds of people" who go randomly stabbing people on the streets.
 |
| What Do You Mean, You People? |
Meanwhile, when someone's life is built around God's explicit command that they go stabbing nonbelievers in the streets, idiot progressive liberals simply parrot back the big, stupid lie, "Diversity is our strength."
But the rule is fairly reliable:
That if something is too good to be true, it probably is.
So I figure she either thinks Jesus is coming and the end times are near, and God's going to wipe away the creatures he personally hand-crafted NOT to evolve in the 6,000 entire years of earth's existence.
Or else she secretly hates the negros and "the Jews"
Or has at least one breast shaped like a llama.
When someone knows they've got something wrong with them, like a sex fetish that's really hard to explain to the cops afterwards, you might be able to detect that it's there. But it's hard to know for sure just exactly what it is.
Hillary Clinton? Prime example.
 |
| What IS Her Deal? |
So strap on your tin foil hats, boys. We're going speculatin'.
Maybe the CIA has recruited her to round up the anonymous thinkin' plebs for GitMo or the gas chambers, which is why her Twitter feed is suspiciously lonely of engagement and she's oddly responsive to my entertaining but otherwise useless tweets.
It's Gotta Be Vampires, I Tell Ya
But oh, God. What a way to die. A naive smile on my face, hoping to please like the little cuck I am on the inside, deep down, right next to the red flag socially inappropriate urges I totally didn't just allude to.
I just love those muppets!
 |
| "Which Is It? Vampires Or Muppets YOU HYPOCRITE." Did You Read That In Sargon of Akkad's Voice? Me, too. |
Where was I?
Yes. So right off the bat, we'll bring up and deal with your objections like "maybe her boyfriend won't marry her until men have rights." And therefore bias.
Which she actually sort of addresses in a very traditional-sounding piece of advice:
Which she actually sort of addresses in a very traditional-sounding piece of advice:
"Don't Settle"
So go first class. Don't settle. (The kind of rare advice also given to a conference room full of millionaires, by the way, who paid top dollar to hear it.) But she explained what she means:Given the divorce rates, you have to be careful who you marry and don't jump in, she says, because you could be 30 or 40 by the time you're out of the relationship and starting over.
Now that you have an idea of what sort of argument she's making, let's show you her biggest feminism-busting video yet:
We have biases and prejudices and things we want to believe.
So it's almost unfortunate that you have to see her face before you read those words. Because I think it's an example of someone bringing her own ideas to the conversation. At least it's not something I've seen in any pop psych or relationship book.
Maybe because it implies something slightly unpalatable and therefore unmarketable. In other words, people won't pay to hear you say "Quit marrying the first guy or girl who comes along."
You don't have to marry the first mistress you knock up. Nor the first mistress who comes along. Find a mistress you really like, and when you're sure, divorce your wife and live happily ever after.
My bias is that she's had a super serious boyfriend since like January. OMG. Have you two picked a date yet?
And anyone who knows me knows I'll do anything but outright lie to break up a girl from Armoured Skeptic on the off chance she finds that to be a remotely appealing quality in a man. Sorry, Skep.
Anyone with experience in the Femosphere can already hear the bleating of the army of harpies...
Internalized misogyny? Is the poor thing just trying to please her man? Maybe. But wouldn't it take one hell of a dude to have pulled that off? Think it through.
A guy who's so sexy she has to work for a living, earn her own money, and use it to buy him shit.
Only this can explain the potato level of webcam show this Perfect 10 is putting on.
Another reason to end feminism... You can't even rate a girl as perfect. Because even that is misogyny. [Not for your benefit, hon. Trying to hold the reader's attention. Kay thanks bye]
In which case, darling... maybe aim a little lower. I don't know your business, your life, what kinks you into honey... but if a man cheated on me, I would whoop his skinny white ass.
Given the wonderland of ass women have to choose from when it comes to sex, they can afford to be picky.
But an ocean of ass turns into a desert of doom when it comes to the wedding proposal.
Nope. Nope. Nope. Because DeBeers. Because muh family court.
I was considering proposing marriage after replaying the first video. Not gonna lie. And then she told me she gotta boyfriend. So ladies.. I'm single. You all know the other word for single, don't you? Say it with me, brothers:
Being my own man, I obviously interpret her advice slightly differently:
You don't have to marry the first mistress you knock up. Nor the first mistress who comes along. Find a mistress you really like, and when you're sure, divorce your wife and live happily ever after.
My bias is that she's had a super serious boyfriend since like January. OMG. Have you two picked a date yet?
 |
| Trump Supporters Aren't Interested In Solving Their Problems Through Feminist Policies |
Anyone with experience in the Femosphere can already hear the bleating of the army of harpies...
Internalized misogyny? Is the poor thing just trying to please her man? Maybe. But wouldn't it take one hell of a dude to have pulled that off? Think it through.
A guy who's so sexy she has to work for a living, earn her own money, and use it to buy him shit.
Only this can explain the potato level of webcam show this Perfect 10 is putting on.
Another reason to end feminism... You can't even rate a girl as perfect. Because even that is misogyny. [Not for your benefit, hon. Trying to hold the reader's attention. Kay thanks bye]
In which case, darling... maybe aim a little lower. I don't know your business, your life, what kinks you into honey... but if a man cheated on me, I would whoop his skinny white ass.
 |
| Girlfriend, You Can Do Better, Honey. Don't Let Him Treat You Dis Way |
Given the wonderland of ass women have to choose from when it comes to sex, they can afford to be picky.
But an ocean of ass turns into a desert of doom when it comes to the wedding proposal.
Nope. Nope. Nope. Because DeBeers. Because muh family court.
I was considering proposing marriage after replaying the first video. Not gonna lie. And then she told me she gotta boyfriend. So ladies.. I'm single. You all know the other word for single, don't you? Say it with me, brothers:
 |
| #MGTOW! |
-------------------------------
UPDATE: Now this is definitely the point when I start sliding off into some serious sleep deprivation. Sorry guys. Enjoy laughing at me.
-------------------------------
What you'll often forget is how hard it is for women in a psychotically feminist society to "land the plane" and get him to commit, given the nightmarish feminist family courts.
The Rules just aren't enough. It's like you can't manipulate men into cutting off their nuts and putting them in your purse anymore. Shocking!
This couldn't be YOUR FAULT, of course. Laying there doing nothing in bed, not
But let's not fix anyone's relationship issues. Her suffering is too important for the movement. Although Cassie Jaye is happier in her relationship now that she's been red-winged. I mean Red-Pilled. Damn those feminists.
YOU SHOULD NEVER BLAME PEOPLE FOR YOUR PROBLEMS.
 |
| Trump's Supporters Don't Need Feminism To Protect Them Anymore |
Except feminists.
Can you imagine how the conversation went?
"Honey, I'm too broke to share my money with ya babe, so you can get a real computer, so the sooner men have rights, the sooner you get your wedding ring. Mkay babe? Work on that."
Although I can't imagine a guy like that could exist outside of a PUA romance novel.
Made ya click, didn't I?
LOL. Before jumping ahead to imaginary motives she may have, like those tribalist feminist otherkins would do, let's be enlightened civil libertarians in the tradition of Greece and Sparta and other cool restaurants and films,,,
And let's set the scene first:
So far, everyone who's predicted Donald Trump's failure has been proven wrong consistently.
But Dilbert Cartoonist Scott Adams (who I suspect will feel internally slighted if I don't also call him a genius master hypnotist and persuader, which he is) did the opposite. Early on, he predicted Trump could win in a landslide, calling him a "master persuader."
Correctly (?) Predicting Trump's landslide victory in November.
But this isn't just about the urgency of a Presidential Election. In some ways, it's even more urgent, depending on who you subscribe to on YouTube. I won't name any Alex Jones. I'm talking about Alex Jones.
Every girl who enters the manosphere tips others into the fray. Sucked into a vortex of misogynistic male attention-seeking pathetic whiney shitlords who are simultaneously too dangerous to be allowed to speak and something which is very cleverly the exact opposite of that.
And sociopathic feminist girls know exactly what to do once they've got some valuable male attention wrapped around their little finger.
Gross.
And there's just no telling how many trainloads of us will have been shipped off to the Tin Foil FEMA camps by then. Internment camps have happened. Even in the U.S.
The Japanese were feared to be spies and locked up, later receiving reparations.
In fact, it looks like the our betters have decided to take the Orwellian route and censor our conservative and libertarian speech, keep tight controls on the establishment press, social media, allow confused boys and girls into the wrong bathroom to even further torture helpless boys without oversight or recourse, specifically to punish any #WrongThink or critical thought going on in the schools.
#ThanksObama
Think it's far-fetched? Look at what's going on with "safe spaces" on campus. And this:
 |
| No, Seriously. This Time, Obama Is Actually Allowing Crazy Feminist Bitches Into Public School Boy's Bathroom |
Why has Obama done this to his own people? Because getting traitors elected is all the rage. In Canada, Sweden, U.S., U.K., Germany... the list goes on.
Opening up bathrooms to anyone who feels like it couldn't be to
Eliminate the Last Possible Refuge for Boys
Where boys and men could have once conceivably gathered (unmolested) to express doubts about the heinous hatred being spread about them by their own teachers, right?
Welcome To North Korea
Provisionally. I'm not saying traitorous politicians are opening the gates to let rapist armies of thug murderers into these defenseless countries full of unarmed civilians. But you can find evidence online, even if it's not broadcast on TV.
Between the transgender bathrooms and mass import of state-dependent refugees, mass indoctrination of schoolteachers, the administration seems to be doing everything it can to collapse the country from within in a matter of months.
So we're not just talking about one pretty girl saying the "right things."
Which would be supes cool anywayz.
But someone who's seemingly even better versed than I am on some of the specific issues she talks about.
So sorry to all the beauty pageant contestants who gave lip service to world peace, but the future of humanity might belong to someone else entirely.
"I've been waiting for a girl like you" - Foreigner, GTA IV
Sure, there are fixxer-uppers out there, but nothing I'm willing or able to do can turn Sargon of Akkad or Harmful Opinions into a cute, blonde young trans woman more acceptable or un-ignorable to the progressive stack.
We'e made do with Milo, to whom we're all grateful. Nowadays, he's pumping iron. Seems he's outgrown the need to a gay guy just to get people to listen to him. So pray the gay away, Milo, if it's all been an act until now.
And he's even fought for my right to make such dreadful suppositions.
 |
| Anita Sarkeesian can Talk To The UN? Okay. Then a Shitlord Can Demand Answers From The White House |
I'm more suspicious it's President Obama that's been putting on an straight act, but you never really know for sure.
If there are any blind spots in Blonde In The Belly of the Beast's knowledge, it's not in crushing the totalitarian state called Progressive Feminism. But in the same nuances of the alt right versus nationalism that nobody clued me in about because maybe
My boobs aren't quite big enough for folks to care whether I live or die.
It sorta goes with being a man, so nothing new there.
I'll be giving you the unvarnished perspective I've got. With the analysis you guys all claim not to want. And the entertainment that hopefully pays some portion of the bills.
Now here's the good, the bad, and the ugly as I see it. All with a dash of speculation based on the facts I have at hand.
The Potential
Beyond looks, I'm still willing to say I haven't seen anyone entering the civil libertarian sphere space with this much obvious potential since Blaire White. Certainly not with an interest in the Men's Rights end of things.
I'd Rather She Were a Black Lesbian
For political purposes, too. Not just personal.
She's quick on her feet, knowledgeable, has an attractive and natural look that's good enough for Fox News tomorrow morning, sounds like she's been pretty committed to knowing her subject, and if you see the description box beneath her video on Islam, I think you'll see...
She's Really Done her Homework and Has Balls Like an Elephant
As have I. It's a lot to ask for 4 hours. (Plus the 4-hour nape I've permitted myself to clear my head and edit.)
And at this point, I'm operating under the assumption she's already blown me off completely. Or about as completely as you CAN blow someone off on Twitter. Why? Because that's always a safe default assumption when a man's dealing with women these days.
Women really wouldn't and shouldn't deal with it unless you know that't the deal.
Now that they're spoiled rotten and can kick your ass around the block, it's a bare minimum they can insist on. If I stop talking to you, you no longer exist to me. So please shut up.
But my old PUA colors are showing again. I'm being a bit of an edgy dick with a sense of humor.
God, for the days when that used to count for something. You would have been positively wwimming in undesirable women.
This talk is fresh on my mind. I've given the speech recently. "You never know, but maybe she's just not that into you."
And I'm also operating under the delusion that no news is good news. It's the Schroedinger's cat theory of human relationships. And of course, there's always money:
 |
| Almost The World's Most Perfect Man: Handsome, Famous, Rich, Athletic |
Could Potentially Plunge Western Civilization Into Another Dark Age
Yes, the same old fearmongering that you know and love now comes with evidence of Facebook's leaked policies on censorship and the re-writing of the English language so that the words rape and pajorative mean whatever the hell they want it to mean.
Everybody knows the looming darkness is only getting darker. We've only just barely been able to beat it back, and not without the help of the brilliant, well-placed people who rushed in at the nick of time.
Except many Americans aren't clued in. They're called progressives. In Soviet Russia, they came to be called the useful idiots.
There's no serious student of history who doesn't see it's repeating. Or at least rhyming. But this time, some of the people who saw it coming are trying to get life to another planet before its too late. I think its...
Hardly an Issue Likely To Be on Derek Jeter's Mind, Given His Lifestyle
@LibtardAmerica /Blonde in the Belly of the Beast has said she's dedicated 10 hours a week to her channel, wants to keep the job she's got, and she's dating a guy who can't necessarily give her every little thing on earth.
She knows something I don't. That's the problem with these people with stupid amounts of intelligence. They come out of nowhere almost fully formed, ready to rock and roll.
I thought I'd need to groom someone like this. Nope. Turns out clipping on the mic will do.
And then I can quickly return to being useless pariah again, for having had some of the opinions which were far less fashionable about a year ago. Not because they challenge the moral authority of the movement, but because it's all about identity politics and tact and self-restraint.
Thinks the establishment didn't see fit to beat into me in government schools
And that was only after making it nearly impossible for dad to stick around. You like that? Your internet is feeding you things in story form. Desperately fighting for your survival while the blogger itself hopes he can slink off and die soon to end the pain of being born #WrongSkin and such like.
 |
| Elwick, (a parody account) was born with a socially inconvenient race, like some of the #BlackLivesMatter protesters. |
So as I was saying, meaning @LibtardAmerica's girlfriend has all the other crucial attributes that you'd expect from a guy like Derek Jeter, except with a brain and missing the rich and famous part. Hence why she's using a crappy, outdated laptop.
Unless that's just for style points. We're all loving the retro chic so far. And it's one way to stimulate donations. Not saying that's a factor in this case. I did promise you some speculation. You're welcome.
@LibtardAmerica is ready to go, but I jumped in too early for someone of my obvious social tardedness. See, social media requires two things. Media. And social. You can't be missing one of the two.
 |
| Sometimes you've gotta take a risk in the crowdsurfing biz. |
What did I expect? They'll have correctly have identified me as a competitor, doing a few bold and reckless things that don't make sense.
Except, for some reason, it's deemed inexcusable when a peasant does it.
Is he normie? No? Then let him die. He'll amount to nothing.
Or at least that's how it feels. The problem with someone who prioritizes knowing what's up and saying so is it comes at the cost of making certain types of "friends."
You'll know who these people are. They're the crowds who laugh when a lady's fallen and can't get up, and may possibly due to a life-threatening hip fracture. You'll see them sipping from their male tears mugs, no matter who's "side" they claim to be on.
Your suspicions will tend to have a self-fulfilling component, but also protect people who've let their guard down around those who are nice to them.
Now that I've passed that torch, and you know something about life that nobody cared about me enough to teach me, and I was too stupid to figure out on my own, is it worth it?
For some. All your mistakes are forgiven if you can scare up an audience.
The quick way: The chalkening.
Don't want to risk your neck with bold publicity stunts for a few fleeting minutes of acknowledgement? Then this games probably not for you. Because it's not a game. It's a high-stakes culture war.
With Emphasis On The War.
I'm willing to risk being hung out to dry, of course. But only if one of the possible outcomes is survival. As long as I might still survive, you can feel free to send me into the game.
If, however, I'm going to be jobless, homeless, and have waves of pissed-off migrant Muslims looking for bloody vengeance like Tommy Robinson, then you just won't find me nearly as flexible as someone in a different position.
Not to discourage you, but if you're any dumber than me, any less brave and determined than me, then you'll have to wait until the coast is cleared for you by people like @LibtardAmerica. Who, in turn, is building on the work of
The problem is, if you have any of the disadvantages, you're quickly doing to find yourself fighting for your life anyway if the establishment has its way with you.
You just can't afford to join forces with someone who doesn't know what the deal is. And for some reason I haven't figured out, there's nobody but me telling people what the deal is.
Ah, right. Because it costs you friends that weren't worth having.
One of the many virtues of jumping on the @LibtardAmerica train already in motion is that she already gets it without you having to write a whole goddamn blog post about it. I've done that for you.
Not only that, but this isn't written to explain things to her, given that, if I've been lucky enough, she'll shortly be explaining a few things to me.
 |
| Hopefully not like this. |
I'm joined by people who've come to regret showing their face when speaking up, and thereby burned all the bridges (or ships) behind them. For them, its now success or nothing.
To honor their sacrifices on your behalf, and on behalf of your family and your freedom, if these people hadn't made the choice to speak out when it was really hard, nobody would have heard their voices.
These people are heroes to me, and I'm proud to support them in every way I can think of. Every way I can afford. And some ways I can't.
Let's look at some of the ways
Problem: Not well-funded at the moment. Money can help fix that. You know what to do.
She's in the most liberal part of an extremely liberal state. And it's getting worse. I was practically disowned by the liberal wing of my family on Mother's Day for nothing more than smelling a little too conservative or just reasonable.
Motives aren't known. It generally takes months for someone to build up any real level of trust. We don't have those months to spare. Meaning all of us. How long did it take Sweden and Germany to go from sorta okay to really not?
Basically from the time they opened the gates to the Three Hours of Terror shooting in Paris.
I can imagine that certain groups of sensitive gents with baggage, history, and struggles who'd otherwise be right beside @LibtardAmerica are likely to associate her voice tone with many of the rejections they've faced in the past.
I don't mean the nasal voice quality itself, but the tone of voice. The slightly higher status that's not quite as endearing to the people if it's not balanced with respect. A voice in the sense that a writer has a narrative style of voice.
You can't fix a voice, but you can fix a tone. Maybe even an attitude. But let's not go crazy, now.
Erin Pizzey does marvelous things with the voice she's got. And they can't attack her for being a man. They can't attack her for being an anti-feminist. She joined the fight for equality as a feminist.
But because she's worked with so many men and women in deep distress in desperate situations starting about 40 years ago, she can talk to men and women in a way that puts them at ease.
For example, I don't beat you over the head with "It's true because I say so" like a social justice moron.
I try to explain to you the reasons why I feel as I do without any hint that you're any greater or lesser of a person for not having seen the evidence I have.
Your time's limited and so's mine. Even if you come to different conclusions than I do, it's not because of any personal failure on your part.
Of course you're not to blame for your genetics or environment leading you to different conclusions than other people. You can use the word culture or racial privilege. I'm adaptable.
I think people have these insecurities and fears that turn conversations into ego battles. I'm sure you've seen it many times.
Without vocal coaching, the shortcut around those fears is to re-frame her perspective to include her the way she talks.
Now for myself, I'd just go way over the top and say "I'm a modern day Marie Antoinette. If I accidentally use the word peasant or slave when I'm talking about dudes, forgive me. I've always had servants to remind me of my manners and make my excuses."
But in @LibtardAmerica's case, (What a lovely name, by the way.) Something more like this:
"The reason why everything about me, including my own voice, gestures, and attitude come across as privileged if not spoiled, and that's directly because as a Western woman, I'm one of the most privileged people who've ever lived. I get to smile. I get to relax. Get paid more and work less at easier jobs. I can get help almost anywhere and any time I need it. I could behave rudely and expect politeness and nobody dares to even politely call me out because it would be rude."
Radical feminists would never approve of you checking your privilege this way, because it acknowledges that average western women are pretty much getting away with murder.
Judging by one of her interviews, she's actually been been able to see from a man's point of view. Which is surprising, given almost nobody outside of the "manosphere" is even talking about or consciously aware of those issues.
But if I didn't point it out, you'd likely disregard this piece as fluff.
"Some of those guys have legitimate grips and some of them have just had problems with women their entire lives or issues with their moms. I'm hearing a lot of that."
But she also gets that being an entitled woman means women aren't the only kinds of problem men have.
Doing it for male attention? Told me she has a boyfriend she's very happy with. And familiar with men's rights such as the video she did on circumcision.
Opportunistic brilliant sociopath? Not a disqualifier, mind you. Milo been a tremendous beneficial influence, and some would call him a sociopath. And in Lauren Feldman's American Milo, a former friend actually did.
Jewish? So many Jewish surnames in this space aren't there? That will happen when you're at the trimtab of society. People vying for position to nudge the rudder to turn the ship of state.
If you look around and DON'T see a lot of Jewish surnames, then what you're doing can't be terribly important at all.
Some will have found their way to SpaceX, for instance, focusing on something like
But I'm not the only one noticing we're being attacked on two flanks:
And just to piss them off, in a close enough Presidential race, I'd imagine she'd say what I've been saying. Which is...
"What if I COULD tip the election to Trump?"
Not smart, fast enough. I'm not bionic. But this woman might be. But the one thing might hold her back is she knows she's the hottest discovery since Blair White
And people can kinda feel when someone's not giving their all. They'll frequently mistake it for arrogance, which it's not.
Yes, I just compared her to Milo, but not by mistake. As you'll soon see. I hope you're smart enough to see it. But...
Why the hell would I suppose that? Because of this:
But because she's worked with so many men and women in deep distress in desperate situations starting about 40 years ago, she can talk to men and women in a way that puts them at ease.
For example, I don't beat you over the head with "It's true because I say so" like a social justice moron.
I try to explain to you the reasons why I feel as I do without any hint that you're any greater or lesser of a person for not having seen the evidence I have.
Your time's limited and so's mine. Even if you come to different conclusions than I do, it's not because of any personal failure on your part.
Of course you're not to blame for your genetics or environment leading you to different conclusions than other people. You can use the word culture or racial privilege. I'm adaptable.
I think people have these insecurities and fears that turn conversations into ego battles. I'm sure you've seen it many times.
Without vocal coaching, the shortcut around those fears is to re-frame her perspective to include her the way she talks.
Now for myself, I'd just go way over the top and say "I'm a modern day Marie Antoinette. If I accidentally use the word peasant or slave when I'm talking about dudes, forgive me. I've always had servants to remind me of my manners and make my excuses."
But in @LibtardAmerica's case, (What a lovely name, by the way.) Something more like this:
"The reason why everything about me, including my own voice, gestures, and attitude come across as privileged if not spoiled, and that's directly because as a Western woman, I'm one of the most privileged people who've ever lived. I get to smile. I get to relax. Get paid more and work less at easier jobs. I can get help almost anywhere and any time I need it. I could behave rudely and expect politeness and nobody dares to even politely call me out because it would be rude."
Radical feminists would never approve of you checking your privilege this way, because it acknowledges that average western women are pretty much getting away with murder.
Judging by one of her interviews, she's actually been been able to see from a man's point of view. Which is surprising, given almost nobody outside of the "manosphere" is even talking about or consciously aware of those issues.
But if I didn't point it out, you'd likely disregard this piece as fluff.
It's An Issue Which Could Hold Her Back Tremendously In Talk Radio Interviews
Some will also pre-judge the California accent, and forget that what she's saying stands"Some of those guys have legitimate grips and some of them have just had problems with women their entire lives or issues with their moms. I'm hearing a lot of that."
But she also gets that being an entitled woman means women aren't the only kinds of problem men have.
Doing it for male attention? Told me she has a boyfriend she's very happy with. And familiar with men's rights such as the video she did on circumcision.
Opportunistic brilliant sociopath? Not a disqualifier, mind you. Milo been a tremendous beneficial influence, and some would call him a sociopath. And in Lauren Feldman's American Milo, a former friend actually did.
Jewish? So many Jewish surnames in this space aren't there? That will happen when you're at the trimtab of society. People vying for position to nudge the rudder to turn the ship of state.
If you look around and DON'T see a lot of Jewish surnames, then what you're doing can't be terribly important at all.
Some will have found their way to SpaceX, for instance, focusing on something like
Getting Mankind Onto a Planet Without Muslims
Too much? Well, the usual standards apply. These are the nutty thoughts based on a predictive model which shows where the flaws in my knowledge and thinking may be. Subject to change without notice or refund.But I'm not the only one noticing we're being attacked on two flanks:
"They're talking about putting men in concentration camps."
Which isn't always necessarily a bad thing. Culling the herd, you see, keeps the herd strong. But war and capitalism already does a marvelous job of culling the human herd without the need for messy, unpleasant, and cliche genocides.And just to piss them off, in a close enough Presidential race, I'd imagine she'd say what I've been saying. Which is...
 |
| Antifeminist Trans Woman Blaire White |
Not smart, fast enough. I'm not bionic. But this woman might be. But the one thing might hold her back is she knows she's the hottest discovery since Blair White
And people can kinda feel when someone's not giving their all. They'll frequently mistake it for arrogance, which it's not.
Yes, I just compared her to Milo, but not by mistake. As you'll soon see. I hope you're smart enough to see it. But...
Why the hell would I suppose that? Because of this:
 |
| She Knows! On March 9 but she still knows. |
You know that feeling you get when a girl made you feel really embarrassed because she knows you masterubate?
Right? That feeling? To her photo? Yeah. That's that same look, but about Europe. Bye, bye. Pretty soon, under these regressive leftist policies, these same streets could look a bit more like this:
Go ahead. Dismiss the fearmongering. Never mind that Iran used to look like this:
And its beaches looked like this:
Advertising: Because sex sells, right?
After the revolution, Iran looks more like this:
She's as aware as you and the rest of us free-thinkers that Europe is facing diminishment, if not outright destruction.
If the New Years' attacks didn't clear that up for you, then you know you're a clueless progressive.
She's come accross as exceptionally well-versed in the topics,
She gave me a definite maybe to my interview request. I generally consider that a decline. Passive aggressive culture, people don't know how to say "no", or don't see the advantages of it.
Still, kind of the right decision on her part, from a time management perspective. And because I don't pull my punches in any of the TWO WHOLE interviews I've done in 8 months.
So I'm unapologetically beauty-centered in this article, and for good reason, even though it goes against the norm. (And against the beloved and almost tolerable normies, some of whom can be saved from their plain vanilla views.)
The way you sell clothes is by giving them to the coolest, most beautiful people first, and show beautiful celebrities people wearing them. Fashion expands out from there.
The way you sell cars is to make the coolest racecar, and people want the street legal version.
The way Trump got financing and publicity wasn't to build the most efficient building ever. Yawn. But to build the tallest and best building.
To say the wildest defensible things.
All of which cuts your massive marketing costs, a lesson he's using to get millions of dollars in free publicity by making fun of people and generally not acting presidential.
Imagine how much you can can accomplish with access to people who want to help you, especially if you're a fearless, attractive young woman who's clued in, opinionated, well-spoken, knows how millenials think, what they know and respond to, how they talk, and has a social and (gift of gab) verbal skillset refined by the privilege of access to people normally accessible only to celebrities, billionaires, and attractive women.
Beyond that, she has an incredible talent for seeing things from another person's point of view. I just got done praising Sargon of Akkad for how good he is at this, and told him how rare this seems to be.
Those kinds of advantages are something Scott Adams called a skill stack. The right combination of skills have propelled Trump farther than the pundits thought.
It's good that women have been jumping in to talk about these issues, because, as Men's Rights Activist Alison Tieman remarked, men kinda can't and shouldn't have to do it at all, much less on their own.
And until men have something to gain by participating in marriage and family, there's no reason to participate. A lot of men are dropping out. That means millenial women can't find a guy willing to marry them.
That's never been any Men's Rights initiative I've heard of, or a patriarchal conspiracy. It's just not worth it. A predictable, if unintended consequence of the policies enforced to protect women.
When a man can't travel with his own children but a man can, when dad can't even sign for a medical treatment but mom can, the kids might not get medical treatments or tests they need to attend school.
So... what if the child has no mother? Does the state take away the kid because
So obviously female supremacy laws which strip away all the rights of men and fathers and families are so vicious and zealous in their implementation and enforcement that we're in a mad rush to destroy society in the name of further privileging the most privileged sex in the most abundant and privileged time.
Until someone makes the case for...
and we start admitting that we care about TV-ready attractive activists who are well spoken, then nobody's going help her promote her message so that people start to care.
Most politicians can really only only respond to the voters. The voters don't know what's going on. They're not allowed to know. They're prohibited from talking about it, and at risk even disagreeing with the establishment, even in their own school bathrooms.
But access to bathrooms hurts people who are or will be women, so we have to pull out all the stops in a mad dash toward totalitarianism for the sake of the women.
Can Trump stop it? Even a billionaire politician like Trump can't get away with saying it.
But this woman and women like her can absolutely say it. Fearlessly, breathlessly, at breakneck pace without interruption, with male interviewers desperately pretending they're not hopelessly distracted.
Birds of a feather flock together.
When a woman goes public and says "there's no reason for men to marry women. We millennials all know the deal," it becomes a little safer to talk about.
Because it plays on the need to help women. In my opinion, it's a feminism killer.
I think that's reason enough to think one extraordinary young person can not only help Trump into the White House if it's a very close race, (because that's what's worked before) and get policies changed in ways that improve your sex life, since married couples have sex about twice as often as single people.
I don't know if we're ready for the rapid changes to society if this makes its way into public consciousness, but I know we won't last much longer on an express train to a totalitarian regime of female supremacy.
Thanks for reading.
* You're still all fired except for 6oodfella, who interviewed her a month ago, while I was working on other projects. Damn it!
She's come accross as exceptionally well-versed in the topics,
If You Can Tolerate Listening To Them
She gave me a definite maybe to my interview request. I generally consider that a decline. Passive aggressive culture, people don't know how to say "no", or don't see the advantages of it.
Still, kind of the right decision on her part, from a time management perspective. And because I don't pull my punches in any of the TWO WHOLE interviews I've done in 8 months.
So I'm unapologetically beauty-centered in this article, and for good reason, even though it goes against the norm. (And against the beloved and almost tolerable normies, some of whom can be saved from their plain vanilla views.)
The way you sell clothes is by giving them to the coolest, most beautiful people first, and show beautiful celebrities people wearing them. Fashion expands out from there.
The way you sell cars is to make the coolest racecar, and people want the street legal version.
The way Trump got financing and publicity wasn't to build the most efficient building ever. Yawn. But to build the tallest and best building.
To say the wildest defensible things.
All of which cuts your massive marketing costs, a lesson he's using to get millions of dollars in free publicity by making fun of people and generally not acting presidential.
Imagine how much you can can accomplish with access to people who want to help you, especially if you're a fearless, attractive young woman who's clued in, opinionated, well-spoken, knows how millenials think, what they know and respond to, how they talk, and has a social and (gift of gab) verbal skillset refined by the privilege of access to people normally accessible only to celebrities, billionaires, and attractive women.
Beyond that, she has an incredible talent for seeing things from another person's point of view. I just got done praising Sargon of Akkad for how good he is at this, and told him how rare this seems to be.
Those kinds of advantages are something Scott Adams called a skill stack. The right combination of skills have propelled Trump farther than the pundits thought.
It's good that women have been jumping in to talk about these issues, because, as Men's Rights Activist Alison Tieman remarked, men kinda can't and shouldn't have to do it at all, much less on their own.
 |
| This Is What A Men's Rights Activist Looks Like |
And until men have something to gain by participating in marriage and family, there's no reason to participate. A lot of men are dropping out. That means millenial women can't find a guy willing to marry them.
That's never been any Men's Rights initiative I've heard of, or a patriarchal conspiracy. It's just not worth it. A predictable, if unintended consequence of the policies enforced to protect women.
When a man can't travel with his own children but a man can, when dad can't even sign for a medical treatment but mom can, the kids might not get medical treatments or tests they need to attend school.
So... what if the child has no mother? Does the state take away the kid because
So obviously female supremacy laws which strip away all the rights of men and fathers and families are so vicious and zealous in their implementation and enforcement that we're in a mad rush to destroy society in the name of further privileging the most privileged sex in the most abundant and privileged time.
Until someone makes the case for...
How This Hurts Very Attractive Women Interested In Marriage
and we start admitting that we care about TV-ready attractive activists who are well spoken, then nobody's going help her promote her message so that people start to care.
Most politicians can really only only respond to the voters. The voters don't know what's going on. They're not allowed to know. They're prohibited from talking about it, and at risk even disagreeing with the establishment, even in their own school bathrooms.
But access to bathrooms hurts people who are or will be women, so we have to pull out all the stops in a mad dash toward totalitarianism for the sake of the women.
Can Trump stop it? Even a billionaire politician like Trump can't get away with saying it.
But this woman and women like her can absolutely say it. Fearlessly, breathlessly, at breakneck pace without interruption, with male interviewers desperately pretending they're not hopelessly distracted.
Birds of a feather flock together.
When a woman goes public and says "there's no reason for men to marry women. We millennials all know the deal," it becomes a little safer to talk about.
It's a message that gets through to people.
Because it plays on the need to help women. In my opinion, it's a feminism killer.
I think that's reason enough to think one extraordinary young person can not only help Trump into the White House if it's a very close race, (because that's what's worked before) and get policies changed in ways that improve your sex life, since married couples have sex about twice as often as single people.
I don't know if we're ready for the rapid changes to society if this makes its way into public consciousness, but I know we won't last much longer on an express train to a totalitarian regime of female supremacy.
Thanks for reading.
* You're still all fired except for 6oodfella, who interviewed her a month ago, while I was working on other projects. Damn it!
No comments:
Post a Comment