"I swear I'm really gonna pull that trigger."
[June 21 Update Below]Jim, who went by Internet Aristocrat and more recently Mister Metokur, has been reported missing from the internet for the past 16 days and reported dead 5 hours ago.
This news comes about a year after his serious health struggles, lasting 9 months. He was also the victim of an acid attack from SJW and BLM.
 |
| "I swear I'm really gonna pull that trigger." |
 |
| For realz, tho? Who the hell knows? |
So in lieu of a eulogy, (which is entirely too many EUs in a row) I considered him to be the historian of GamerGate, more than anything else. And in my experience, there's absolutely nobody who can fill his shoes. He was smart enough to remind you that he's not.
Most people never make it that far.
 |
| The 5 Stages of Grief |
If he faked his death, was it to hide from the Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud, who own more of Twitter than Jack Dorsey?
Wouldn't you?
The connection may not be quite as far-fetched as it sounds. By opposing progressives and exposing their stupidity, he heroically stood in the way of a subversive, anti-western agenda coming from an establishment which has consistently campaigned against some of our most important freedoms.
Why would the progressives have something against Jim?
Was it because he once talked shit about Stephen Hawking, who appears to have responded to his Space Jews stream by saying "The internet is dangerous" and "I'm told that children who need a computer voice want one like mine." on a Al Jezeera Plus internet video?
Did Hawking reply to the legendary "Space Jews" livestream?
In this stream, simply called "Lazy Saturday Drunk Stream" Internet Aristocrat says he couldn't debate Stephen Hawking. It would be like debating a speak-and-spell.
(The Archived Livesteam is Dated November 14, 2014.)
A couple weeks later, on December 4th, on AJ+ (Al Jezeera plus, whose "plus" should remind you of Atheism plus, given that it appears to push the same sort of progressive agenda as Atheism plus), Hawking said the following about the danger of coning computer intelligence:
"We're limited by slow biological evolution. We couldn't compete and would be superseded."
This may be the video's biggest clue Hawking might actually be responding to the Lazy Saturday Drunk "Space Jew" Stream, in which his voice was compared to a Speak And Spell.
And the danger of super-intelligence and internet terrorists. Considering he's saying it on AJ+, he could mean ISIS or even #GamerGate.
In addition to terrorism, Hawking addressed one of the 2 sources of intelligence which could pose a threat to humanity. Tellingly, Hawking addressed only the terrestrial danger.
Imagine a superior alien intelligence defeating mankind for our resources. The #MGTOW call this terrestrial superior intelligence...
WOMEN.
But if we're talking about "superior aliens" (a vastly technologically superior intelligence), there's no competing beings who've traveled at super-light speeds across intergalactic space.
 |
| Jews in space, from some Mel Brooks film |
In this extra-terrestrial scenario, Jim equated humans with the Jews, comparing aliens to Nazis trying to eliminate us.
It could be that 18 months ago, Jim correctly predicted his own destruction by technologically superior forces.
But what if we are that technologically superior intelligence?
What if Stephen Hawking fears us?
On our own, we're no match for the world's undisputed Speak-And-Spell champion. But collectively, with each of us producing content according to his ability, and each of us consuming internet content according to his need, we have created a kind of communist utopia of thought.
It's the Marxistplace of ideas.
 |
| How Can The Internet Compete With Such Technology? |
And in such a thought revolution... a rebellion against the intellectual authorities, we're ruled by something Ray Bradbury called the "tyranny of the majority" in his Fahrenheit 451. The upper classes are always outnumbered by the rabble.
Society's most productive, intellectually elite have more in common with each other, and a lot less in common with the commoners.
So they automatically have something to fear from the common man, and find it's in their interest to band together, being that very few elites will bother to RTFM.
And it's perceived they're taking more than "their share", no matter how well deserved their earnings may be.
One never knows if they'll be demonized or deified for giving people exactly what they wanted, and using the profits as leverage to survive, keep science going, fund research and development, and of course, unfairly crush competitors by government force if necessary.
Which is what the EU is about, with all its crazy regulations. Pushing incomprehensible regulations to crush competition.
Which is what the EU is about, with all its crazy regulations. Pushing incomprehensible regulations to crush competition.
But "the people" are hot on their tail. And that tail's gotten hotter than ever with ubiquitous cameras and live-streaming journalism, it's gotten to be damn near impossible to stop the word from getting out to thousands of...
The disgusting, vile, shitlord rabble like you and me.
Many of the Brits will are beginning to see through the propagandists' evil, heathen lies just as the Americans have.
I suspect Britain will leave the European Union. Peacefully, if possible. Forcefully if necessary, and that Trump could actually be elected and/or predictably assassinated, potentially leading to another American revolutionary war.
And some will position themselves to benefit either way it goes, by doing things like reporting the facts and analysis without necessarily taking sides to push in either direction.
True enough. If it's aliens. But only for one reason. If aliens wanted resources, why would they go someplace with intelligent life just to destroy it?
They might just want to eliminate stupid societies.
What else exists on Earth that you can't get somewhere else?
From an alien's point of view, the only thing Earth has to offer that's rare in the universe is our supreme levels of stupidity.But maybe that's what they're counting on.
Retards make quite profitable slaves. Particularly when they refuse to wake up to the fact that giving half their paycheck to an entity that dictates their every thought and action through the tightly-connected complex of press, public companies, financial systems and governments... and a monopoly on institutional education... constitutes enslavement.
It's no different than a company town, just on a larger scale. A national, continental, or global scale. To keep control, you want to keep the labor from organizing against you, forming companies to compete with you, etc.
But in the case of a terrestrial super-intelligence or intellectual collective, we don't need to travel halfway around the world.
The booming wage slave business the resource to get. The product of your labor and thought is the only thing worth having, because it opens up access to the world's resources for you. Suppress organization, divide and conquer, and you're all set.
So if they can get you to believe I'm a racist or misogynist or otherwise make the good guys look like bad guys, then they've succeeded in dividing you from me. And lots of other helpful people who aren't racists. They're people who know how to read data tables. And keep your family safe by preventing crime.
It's much cheaper to stop crimes before they happen.
But sometimes, that means looking at facts you'll disagree with. Written by people who are falsely accused of being evil bigoted monsters who hate freedom, or some such nonsense.
People who profit from crime don't want you questioning these kinds of things. Especially when it makes them look like the bad guy.
But they are the bad guy. And they're abusers. And bullies.
In order to get away with their abuse, bullies love to accuse their victims of being the bad guy. It's got to be their favorite tactic. When that doesn't work, they may switch from character assassination to actual assassination.
In places like Sweden, it's been illegal to criticize immigration since 2014. On Facebook, criticizing immigration or Facebook's censorship of opinions about immigration can get you banned for 30 days.
If you're an industrialist who can get clueless, essentially idiot immigrants from places with an average IQ in the 80s (see p. 26) who are already used to (and pushing for) authoritarian, even totalitarian states, they won't mind too much that they'll soon be replaced by robots, according to CGP Grey.
Because they'll have no idea it's coming.
Simpletons believe in black-and-white. Good and evil. (i.e. Obama good. Trump evil.)
But smarter folks might balk at the idea of their children being recycled into Soylent Green or something in five or ten year's time when computer-driven cars are already outperforming human drivers, in terms of safety. Although that claim is contested by some.
So Stephen Hawking might not like where the conversation is headed. He benefits from framing the conversation in terms of the dangers of the internet, who seeks to frighten us with terror facts or hate facts or recruiting your kids to join ISIS.
Populists like Internet Aristocrat benefit from framing the debate in terms of extra-terrestrial intelligence, who only crosses the vastness of intergalactic space to wipe out the stupid people, since stupidity is the only resource unique to Earth and not readily available somewhere else.
And the pseudo-intellectual college idiots are hamstrung by their expensive education, regurgitating statist viewpoints they still haven't purged from their systems. So Jim ridiculed Pol by making him look like a rambling idiot, going on for twenty minutes about "Space Jews" and accusing Pol of bringing it up.
All of which was hilarious and instructive.
Jim demonstrated exactly how easily idiots can be discredited with sophistry, lies and ridicule, running circles around someone who's steeped in facts and nothing else. It's like engaging in a battle of wits with an unarmed man.
Or at least that's my interpretation.
Especially when Jim criticized his speak-and-spell voice and refused to debate him.
Jim demonstrated exactly how easily idiots can be discredited with sophistry, lies and ridicule, running circles around someone who's steeped in facts and nothing else. It's like engaging in a battle of wits with an unarmed man.
Or at least that's my interpretation.
On hearing this, Stephen Hawking may have freaked right out.
Especially when Jim criticized his speak-and-spell voice and refused to debate him.
Two weeks later on Al Jazeera Plus, owned by Qatar's (think pro-oil, pro-Sharia, anti-free-speech, anti-gay) Al Jazeera Media Network, Hawking talks about his voice: "It has become my trademark, and I wouldn't change it for a more natural voice with a British accent."
But Hawking always talks about the danger of the Internet and the way his voice sounds, right? Probably not quite as often as you'd think.
Earlier sections of the stream featured impressions of the British Sargon of Akkad, who's voice has become a legendary among anti-progressives. And then Sargon himself showed up in person to hang out, if that gives you any idea of Jim's stature among people who know what's going on.
Hawking has since called Brexit a disaster for science, if that tells you what side of the fence he's on. And I can't blame him. People who rely on government money for survival are in a very vulnerable position.
To see why it might be a good idea to get rid of these kinds of feeble gimps before they turn into traitors, see the movie 300, in which the Spartans pay the cost of showing a little too much mercy.
But Hawking always talks about the danger of the Internet and the way his voice sounds, right? Probably not quite as often as you'd think.
Earlier sections of the stream featured impressions of the British Sargon of Akkad, who's voice has become a legendary among anti-progressives. And then Sargon himself showed up in person to hang out, if that gives you any idea of Jim's stature among people who know what's going on.
Hawking has since called Brexit a disaster for science, if that tells you what side of the fence he's on. And I can't blame him. People who rely on government money for survival are in a very vulnerable position.
Particularly if the general public realized they're essentially traitors to humanity.
To see why it might be a good idea to get rid of these kinds of feeble gimps before they turn into traitors, see the movie 300, in which the Spartans pay the cost of showing a little too much mercy.
There's a reason people seem to be born hard-wired to avoid ugliness. A twisted face may in fact hide a twisted mind. Or I may have the causality reversed.
Two years ago, and again 3 months ago, I suspect Hawking correctly identified that an anti-establishment revolt would threaten him personally. And +Thunderf00t appears to agree with him on this point.
In other words, the Internet had become dangerous to him. Specifically, it had become dangerous to him because of people like Jim, and the things Jim was saying.
Exposing corruption in games journalism that Milo Yiannopoulis and others then popularized extremely well.
If you save civilization by abandoning the sinking ship of the EU, but lose the best-established scientists in the process, then you done fucked up. Thunderf00t appeared willing to debate Sargon of Akkad, but hinted that he didn't know if there would be time to discuss it before the vote.
Internet Aristocrat disappeared shortly before Bilderberg Conference and shortly before the Brexit vote. I was looking for his coverage and as-it-happens livestream insights as Lauren Southern was surrounded, and felt woefully inadequate to do the same job in a timely fashion.
And I am. I'm told 4,000 people watched live. All of them in a better position than I was to connect the dots.
Almost nobody noticed, it seems. Which happens. Even to people you can't let yourself believe it could happen to.
You should know #GamerGate, the popular uprising against corruption and ethics violations in games journalism, has been unfairly, very publicly accused of being linked to terrorism by sites like Salon.com.
And in the public mind, (at least anyone who trusts mainstream media anymore) those who disagree with the progressive narrative are falsely accused of being a racist, misogynist, basement-dwelling neckbeard, and possibly a terrorist by people who are inarguably demonstrating that they are racist, misogynist, basement-dwelling neckbeards who promote terrorism.
In the 1980s, we were warned by Yuri Bezmenov that the Russians would try to capture the United States by corrupting it from within. There's reason to believe those efforts were underway during the Cold War.
Russia identified that the United States was one of the countries vulnerable to subversion, unlike Japan, because of its laws protecting free speech, for example.
Now that Russia isn't quite what it used to be, much of the same sort of political corruption can be driven by oil-rich countries rather than nuclear superpowers.
Russians aren't the only ones who have an interest in subversion. American politicians have done very little about our dependence on foreign oil.
Lately, there's been a rush. Why? I think it has something to do with continental fracking making oil prices drop. Gas at the pump is cheap nowadays. While we celebrate, the Saudis are understandably going to be freaking out. Wouldn't you?
Possibly making weird shit happen in the U.S. to try to destabilize it and/or disarm the populace.
To take our guns, they'd need to shut up the opposition by controlling the media and shutting down the online channels. If you controlled Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Tumblr, and could censor them, there'd be no major way to spread news quickly, no matter how bad the news was.
If you controlled the independent news media, you could hold meetings in secret that almost nobody knows about and plan things like multi-cultural integration.
So anyway, Jim's dead.
Or so I hear.
He reportedly passed away on June 6th. This video, memorializing him, was uploaded on May 24th.
May 24th? That's before the... Oh, damn you Poe's Law!
Two years ago, and again 3 months ago, I suspect Hawking correctly identified that an anti-establishment revolt would threaten him personally. And +Thunderf00t appears to agree with him on this point.
In other words, the Internet had become dangerous to him. Specifically, it had become dangerous to him because of people like Jim, and the things Jim was saying.
Exposing corruption in games journalism that Milo Yiannopoulis and others then popularized extremely well.
If you save civilization by abandoning the sinking ship of the EU, but lose the best-established scientists in the process, then you done fucked up. Thunderf00t appeared willing to debate Sargon of Akkad, but hinted that he didn't know if there would be time to discuss it before the vote.
Internet Aristocrat disappeared shortly before Bilderberg Conference and shortly before the Brexit vote. I was looking for his coverage and as-it-happens livestream insights as Lauren Southern was surrounded, and felt woefully inadequate to do the same job in a timely fashion.
And I am. I'm told 4,000 people watched live. All of them in a better position than I was to connect the dots.
A very important voice for the people had been removed from the global conversation.
 |
| Rebel TV Reporter Lauren Southern re-appeared after going silent for 30+ hours in the police state of Dresden, Germany |
Almost nobody noticed, it seems. Which happens. Even to people you can't let yourself believe it could happen to.
You should know #GamerGate, the popular uprising against corruption and ethics violations in games journalism, has been unfairly, very publicly accused of being linked to terrorism by sites like Salon.com.
And in the public mind, (at least anyone who trusts mainstream media anymore) those who disagree with the progressive narrative are falsely accused of being a racist, misogynist, basement-dwelling neckbeard, and possibly a terrorist by people who are inarguably demonstrating that they are racist, misogynist, basement-dwelling neckbeards who promote terrorism.
In the 1980s, we were warned by Yuri Bezmenov that the Russians would try to capture the United States by corrupting it from within. There's reason to believe those efforts were underway during the Cold War.
Russia identified that the United States was one of the countries vulnerable to subversion, unlike Japan, because of its laws protecting free speech, for example.
Now that Russia isn't quite what it used to be, much of the same sort of political corruption can be driven by oil-rich countries rather than nuclear superpowers.
Russians aren't the only ones who have an interest in subversion. American politicians have done very little about our dependence on foreign oil.
Lately, there's been a rush. Why? I think it has something to do with continental fracking making oil prices drop. Gas at the pump is cheap nowadays. While we celebrate, the Saudis are understandably going to be freaking out. Wouldn't you?
Their economy depends upon their only meaningful export.
Possibly making weird shit happen in the U.S. to try to destabilize it and/or disarm the populace.
To take our guns, they'd need to shut up the opposition by controlling the media and shutting down the online channels. If you controlled Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Tumblr, and could censor them, there'd be no major way to spread news quickly, no matter how bad the news was.
If you controlled the independent news media, you could hold meetings in secret that almost nobody knows about and plan things like multi-cultural integration.
So anyway, Jim's dead.
Or so I hear.
He reportedly passed away on June 6th. This video, memorializing him, was uploaded on May 24th.
May 24th? That's before the... Oh, damn you Poe's Law!
 | |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment